Re: 'pu' branch for StGIT

From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Aug 10, 2007, 00:30 UTC
Message-ID: <20070810003014.GA18294@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0708091431k57ac095asa940cca73ad95b13@mail.gmail.com>

On 2007-08-09 22:31:09 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> I'll merge many of Karl's patches for the next stable release (which
> I hope to be sooner than the current 0.13) but I'm still on holiday
> for one more week and can't do much work (busy with DIY).

Great! Would you like me to select the "safe" topics and give you a single integration branch to pull, or do you want to be the one that does the selecting?

> Thanks to Karl for setting up this experimental branch. BTW, what
> does 'pu' mean?

Proposed Updates, as I recall. But I just used that to explain how my branch is going to behave (meaning: it'll behave like Junio's pu branch); it isn't actually called "pu". Not so pedagogical if no one has heard of Junio's pu branch, I guess. :-)

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle