Re: [PATCH] commit: fix pretty-printing of messages with "\nencoding "
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 28, 2007, 22:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070328221517.GA25430@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7it1f29s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:10:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> The function is correct; the only reason it may recode to > non-utf8 is the user (or Porcelain such as qgit or gitk) > explicitly asked to do so -- from the final output they will get > the message in user-native encoding and without the extra > encoding header, thus we retain the backward compatible > behaviour before the re-encoding feature was introduced.
I see. But then why do we not simply strip the encoding header entirely, and return in native format? Why do we insert a new encoding header _only_ when there was one previously?
-Peff