Re: Errors cloning large repo

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Mar 10, 2007, 06:01 UTC
Message-ID: <20070310060144.GA3223@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703092145550.10832@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > 
> > I'm shocked you were able to repack an 8.5 GiB repository.
> 
> Side note - it would be nice to hear just how big the repository *really* 
> is.
> 
> For example, if "du -sh" says 8.5GB, it doesn't necessarily mean that 
> there really is 8.5GB of data there.

Oh, good point.  Thanks for reminding me of reality.

I'm just so used to not looking at repository size unless the repository has been fully repacked first. So I somehow just read this thread has Anton having 8.5 GiB worth of *packed* data (where filesystem wastage in the tail block is minimal) and not 8.5 GiB of loose objects.

Its very likely this did fit in just under 4 GiB of packed data,
but as you said, without O_LARGEFILE we can't work with it.

> So this really could be a situation where just small tweaks makes it work 
> out for now. We'll need the full 64-bit index eventually for sure, but..

Yes.  ;-)

-- 
Shawn.