Re: [PATCH 1/2] Document the master@{n} reflog query syntax.

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Jan 18, 2007, 15:48 UTC
Message-ID: <20070118154845.GD15428@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <45AF4CDF.5010406@op5.se>

Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> >Jim Treadway <jim@stardot-tech.com> wrote:
> >>On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> >>>-  of the ref at a prior point in time.  This suffix may only be
> >>>+  of the ref at a prior point in time.This suffix may only be
> >>I'm guessing that the above was unintentional?
> >
> >Yes.  Danngit.  Junio, can you hand edit that patch?
> >
> 
> I'm starting to see --amend as an extremely useful thing to have, and 
> I'm sure Junio thinks the same. For fixes this small, it sure is easier 
> to just --amend the commit than to ask for a new patch to apply.

I still shouldn't have let that change sneak into the diff. I know how it happened, I wanted to copy part of that line so I wiggled it around in vi, copied it, then hit undo. I didn't undo back far enough. Then I didn't read the diff closely enough before sending.

> Out of curiousity, how many other SCM's allow you to --amend a commit?

None that I know of.

-- 
Shawn.