From: Shawn O. Pearce Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:48:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Document the master@{n} reflog query syntax. Message-ID: <20070118154845.GD15428@spearce.org> In-Reply-To: <45AF4CDF.5010406@op5.se> Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >Jim Treadway wrote: > >>On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >>>- of the ref at a prior point in time. This suffix may only be > >>>+ of the ref at a prior point in time.This suffix may only be > >>I'm guessing that the above was unintentional? > > > >Yes. Danngit. Junio, can you hand edit that patch? > > > > I'm starting to see --amend as an extremely useful thing to have, and > I'm sure Junio thinks the same. For fixes this small, it sure is easier > to just --amend the commit than to ask for a new patch to apply. I still shouldn't have let that change sneak into the diff. I know how it happened, I wanted to copy part of that line so I wiggled it around in vi, copied it, then hit undo. I didn't undo back far enough. Then I didn't read the diff closely enough before sending. > Out of curiousity, how many other SCM's allow you to --amend a commit? None that I know of. -- Shawn.