Re: [PATCH - todo] Changes to e-mailed patch handling in v1.5.0
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 18, 2007, 08:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200701180818.12372.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhcupp81v.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wednesday 2007 January 17 23:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am neutral about changing the default suffix from .txt to .patch; > comments?
I'm in favour. The extension indicates file type, and gives guidance on the tool that can read it. Though .patch is stored in text it's more than that (c.f. .html) - the text inside it has meaning beyond just the text.
To me, .txt would implies that the file format is in human-language format (i.e. words, sentences, and paragraphs).
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE andyparkins@gmail.com