Re: [PATCH] Create 'git gc' to perform common maintenance operations.
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Dec 27, 2006, 07:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061227075330.GA23022@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr6ul93wz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes: > > > +The optional configuration variable 'gc.reflogExpireUnreachable' > > +can be set to indicate how long historical reflog entries which > > +are not part of the current branch should remain available in > > +this repository. These types of entries are generally created as > > +a result of using `git commit \--amend` or `git rebase` and are the > > +commits prior to the amend or rebase occuring. Since these changes > > +are not part of the current project most users will want to expire > > +them sooner. This option defaults to '60 days'. > > Should I update the default expire-unreachable in builtin-reflog > to match 60 days?
Doh, I meant for git-gc to match the default in 'git-reflog expire'. Whoops.
I don't care either way. 60 days may be too long for some users, but for others it may be nice to have. I think the two defaults should match just because. Feel free to edit my patch before applying to be whatever 'git-reflog expire' uses if you want.
-- Shawn.