Re: Collection of stgit issues and wishes
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 10, 2006, 23:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200612110002.05847.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b0943d9e0612101426l763d46cahe15683410cb4398d@mail.gmail.com>
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 10/12/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> The git commands StGit uses to perform operations automatically record >> changes in branches in reflog. What StGit does not provide is the "reason". >> You do use git-update-ref? > > Yes, only for updating HEAD. The refs in refs/patches/<branch>/ are > written directly. I initialy wanted to add patch history support using > reflogs and added "git-update-ref -m ..." for the patch commits but I > found slow the pushing operation a bit. Do you only want to track the > reflogs for HEAD?
Yes, I want for StGit to provide reasons when updating HEAD. I know that StGit manages it's own versioning of patches not using reflog -- fine. What matters for me is reflog for HEAD after "stg commit; stg clean".
-- Jakub Narebski