From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:02:05 GMT
Subject: Re: Collection of stgit issues and wishes
Message-ID: <200612110002.05847.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0612101426l763d46cahe15683410cb4398d@mail.gmail.com>

Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 10/12/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:

>> The git commands StGit uses to perform operations automatically record
>> changes in branches in reflog. What StGit does not provide is the "reason".
>> You do use git-update-ref?
> 
> Yes, only for updating HEAD. The refs in refs/patches/<branch>/ are
> written directly. I initialy wanted to add patch history support using
> reflogs and added "git-update-ref -m ..." for the patch commits but I
> found slow the pushing operation a bit. Do you only want to track the
> reflogs for HEAD?

Yes, I want for StGit to provide reasons when updating HEAD. I know that
StGit manages it's own versioning of patches not using reflog -- fine.
What matters for me is reflog for HEAD after "stg commit; stg clean".

-- 
Jakub Narebski