Re: [PATCH] Improve git-prune -n output
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2006, 17:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200610261837.31356.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlkn3kn65.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thursday 2006, October 26 18:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not have an objection to what this does, except I wonder if > somebody's script relies on parsing this output already.
I did think of that, but the existing output looked pretty non-useful for easy parsing because of the fact that filenames where being printed instead of hashes. If I were given free reign I think I'd want to drop the "would prune" message as well.
> It is customary to have one empty line before the S-o-b: line.
I didn't do it. Git did :-) I'll keep an eye out for it from now on. Apologies (as usual)
Andy
-- Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE