Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-format-patch: Make the second and subsequent mails replies to the first
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 15, 2006, 07:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060715074532.GF13776@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwtagnfsk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:32:27PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that...
Show 10 quoted lines
> Josh Triplett <josht@us.ibm.com> writes: > > > ..., but you > > suggested that you didn't mind having threading as the default. > > Did I? ... then that was either a mistake or miscommunication. > > I do mind changing the default output. I do not mind threading > as the default ONLY IF user asks for output with these extra > headers.
What's the big deal? It's not like we didn't change those things in the past if it doesn't horribly break everything and the new behaviour is clearly more sensible.
It would be good to know what the general policy on this is nowadays.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise. Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam