Re: [RFC/PATCH] date parsing: be friendlier to our European friends.
- From
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
- Date
- Apr 5, 2006, 22:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060405224751.GA10139@mars.ravnborg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlkujzly0.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:39:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> This does three things, only applies to cases where the user > manually tries to override the author/commit time by environment > variables, with non-ISO, non-2822 format date-string: > > - Refuses to use the interpretation to put the date in the > future; recent kernel history has a commit made with > 10/03/2006 which is recorded as October 3rd. > > - Adds '.' as the possible year-month-date separator. We > learned from our European friends on the #git channel that > dd.mm.yyyy is the norm there.
I my company we have always used yyyy-mm-dd - this is an ISO standard IIRC. The company is European based.
mm/dd/yy has always made my head spin ;-)
Sam