Re: HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone)
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2006, 10:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060404100035.GM27689@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060403180929.GA14967@reactrix.com>
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:09:30PM CEST, I got a letter where Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com> said that...
> Long term, this could give a repo admin the choice of either making sure > git-update-server-info has been run after every ref/pack change or > enabling DAV once. Assuming they need to use HTTP.
Well, what is the actual advantage of DAV compared to git-update-server-info? Why would I prefer enabling DAV?
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time. I think I have forgotten this before.