From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:00:35 GMT
Subject: Re: HTTP repo referencing stale heads (can't clone)
Message-ID: <20060404100035.GM27689@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20060403180929.GA14967@reactrix.com>

Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:09:30PM CEST, I got a letter
where Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com> said that...
> Long term, this could give a repo admin the choice of either making sure
> git-update-server-info has been run after every ref/pack change or
> enabling DAV once.  Assuming they need to use HTTP.

Well, what is the actual advantage of DAV compared to
git-update-server-info? Why would I prefer enabling DAV?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Right now I am having amnesia and deja-vu at the same time.  I think
I have forgotten this before.