Re: What should I use instead of git show?
- From
- Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2006, 16:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060313165842.GD87487@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603130830050.3618@g5.osdl.org>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:33:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Why not just use "git show"? > > It hasn't gone anywhere that I know of. It's still there.
Oh beautiful.
I had an old (as in 3 months max, but heh) git-tree at work in a corner from which I had compiled git. When I saw it didn't have git show which I have at home I did a git pull, recompile, reinstall.
The new git didn't have git show, so I thought it had been removed after all. Turns out, the git pull had broken halfway due to the old version of git. It hadn't fast forwarded _all_ the versions. But the new git, while not current, has been able to do the complete git pull this time. And now I have git show at work too.
Guess you have to update git every month or so if you want to be able to follow current trees.
OG.