Re: What should I use instead of git show?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:17:47PM +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Monday 13 March 2006 15:47, Olivier Galibert wrote yet:
> > Since it seems to be gone.
> >
> > Up until now, when I wanted to send a patch to someone with the
> > associated changelog, I just did a git log to find the changelog sha1
> > then a git show to get the goods. How am I supposed to do that now?
>
> Why not use git-whatchanged? It's exacly meant to do this.
Indeed, git-whatchanged -p origin..HEAD worked. Thanks.
> Or try qgit, or even gitk (which is what git show did).
gitk does not seem to have an export function. Dunno about qgit.
OG.