Re: Joining cg-*-id
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2005, 21:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050919215608.GA13845@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <1127166049.26772.26.camel@dv>
Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:40:49PM CEST, I got a letter where Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> told me that...
> Hello!
Hello,
> I believe Cogito should keep the command list short. When the *-id > utilities got the cg-prefix, the list became longer by 3 commands.
well, those commands are semi-public, actually. E.g. cg-help does not list them.
> What if we join cg-commit-id, cg-parent-id and cg-tree-id into one cg-id > (or cg-admin-id) utility? It would work like cg-commit-id in absence of > switches, -p would make it work like cg-parent-id, and -t would make it > cg-tree-id.
Perhaps cg-object-id? I'm not principially opposed to that, but I don't see much value in it either. Perhaps if this would come along with the usage of git-rev-parse (see below)...
> Alternatively, this functionality should go to git. It's low-level > enough to be there.
There is git-rev-parse, but it is not as powerful (cannot take dates and sha1 completion does not work when listing parents) - OTOH it can complete sha1 ids even inside packs, which is really useful. Still, IMHO its usage is awful, so it'd take place for cg-Xnormid, but we would still keep the *-id frontends (which would also handle the dates).
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox