Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From
- Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jun 29, 2005, 10:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050629102746.GA2484@ucw.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <12B6F9A5-81F8-46BD-A05D-B9FA1A70A9FF@mac.com>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:53:47PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote: > >there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over > >choice of scm. > > I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will > be long before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, > such that I can "hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have > Linus "git pull" from a multiprotocol bridge.
I hope this will happen sooner than later, since that way the competition between git and mercurial will give us the best tools while keeping interoperability.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR