Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From
- Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2005, 23:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050628232951.GW12006@waste.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4846.10.10.10.24.1119999568.squirrel@linux1>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:59:28PM -0400, Sean wrote:
> Afterall, Mecurial just took the basic ideas from Linus' and adapted > them to a different back end.
??!
Just for the record, Mercurial had working distributed merge before Git had any sort of merge at all. So it's hardly a case of me copying git.
Linus and I both freely borrowed ideas from Monotone and others and thus there is some rough similarity between the two.
-- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.