git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull

From
IMIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date
May 15, 2005, 06:22 UTC
Message-ID
<20050515062243.GA22021@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To
<20050512182340.GA324@pasky.ji.cz>
* Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> > Mercurial is also much smarter than rsync at determining what
> > outstanding changesets exist. Here's an empty pull as a demonstration:
> > 
> >  $ time hg merge hg://selenic.com/linux-hg/
> >  retrieving changegroup
> > 
> >  real    0m0.363s
> >  user    0m0.083s
> >  sys     0m0.007s
> > 
> > That's a single http request and a one line response.
> 
> So, what about comparing it with something comparable, say git pull 
> over HTTP? :-)
Matt, did you get around to do such a comparison?
	Ingo
Previous: Petr Baudis
Message 14 of 14 in “Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull”
  1. Matt MackallMay 12, 2005
  2. Petr BaudisMay 12, 2005
  3. Matt MackallMay 12, 2005
  4. Petr BaudisMay 12, 2005
  5. Matt MackallMay 12, 2005
  6. Daniel BarkalowMay 12, 2005
  7. Matt MackallMay 12, 2005
  8. Daniel BarkalowMay 13, 2005
  9. Matt MackallMay 13, 2005
  10. Daniel BarkalowMay 13, 2005
  11. Matt MackallMay 13, 2005
  12. Petr BaudisMay 13, 2005
  13. Petr BaudisMay 15, 2005
  14. Ingo MolnarMay 15, 2005

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.