From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 06:22:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
Message-ID: <20050515062243.GA22021@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20050512182340.GA324@pasky.ji.cz>


* Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:

> > Mercurial is also much smarter than rsync at determining what
> > outstanding changesets exist. Here's an empty pull as a demonstration:
> > 
> >  $ time hg merge hg://selenic.com/linux-hg/
> >  retrieving changegroup
> > 
> >  real    0m0.363s
> >  user    0m0.083s
> >  sys     0m0.007s
> > 
> > That's a single http request and a one line response.
> 
> So, what about comparing it with something comparable, say git pull 
> over HTTP? :-)

Matt, did you get around to do such a comparison?

	Ingo