Re: Rename tracking

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Date: May 14, 2005, 16:21 UTC
Message-ID: <20050514162133.GW3905@pasky.ji.cz>
In-Reply-To: <7v4qd523p1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Dear diary, on Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:05:30PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> told me that...

Show 6 quoted lines

> >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> writes:
> 
> PB> I'll postpone it for another while since there is still some discussion
> PB> about tuning the output.
> 
> What discussion did I miss???

Mainly

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:03:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect diff-tree-helper -R
Message-ID: <20050514150356.GK3905@pasky.ji.cz>

Show 10 quoted lines

> PB> I'm thinking about using "\n---\n\n" in commit message to separate some
> PB> "internal data" like this. cg-log (and web interfaces and other
> PB> toolkits, if we get to agree on something common) could then by default
> PB> hide it. Below it would contain something which we could hopefully embed
> PB> in patches too (actually less work for extracting patches by cg-mkpatch
> PB> or similar tools). What do you think?
> 
> Since I have not been particularly interested in rename tracking
> (because I myself personally have not felt the need for it), I
> do not offhand have much idea worth to offer.  Sorry.

Well, I'd say that with those renaming patches we are feeling the need for it?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor