From: Petr Baudis Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 16:21:33 GMT Subject: Re: Rename tracking Message-ID: <20050514162133.GW3905@pasky.ji.cz> In-Reply-To: <7v4qd523p1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Dear diary, on Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:05:30PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano told me that... > >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis writes: > > PB> I'll postpone it for another while since there is still some discussion > PB> about tuning the output. > > What discussion did I miss??? Mainly From: Petr Baudis Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:03:56 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect diff-tree-helper -R Message-ID: <20050514150356.GK3905@pasky.ji.cz> > PB> I'm thinking about using "\n---\n\n" in commit message to separate some > PB> "internal data" like this. cg-log (and web interfaces and other > PB> toolkits, if we get to agree on something common) could then by default > PB> hide it. Below it would contain something which we could hopefully embed > PB> in patches too (actually less work for extracting patches by cg-mkpatch > PB> or similar tools). What do you think? > > Since I have not been particularly interested in rename tracking > (because I myself personally have not felt the need for it), I > do not offhand have much idea worth to offer. Sorry. Well, I'd say that with those renaming patches we are feeling the need for it? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor