Re: cg-log patches
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- May 8, 2005, 19:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050508190109.GC9495@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <1896.10.10.10.24.1115577733.squirrel@linux1>
Dear diary, on Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:42:13PM CEST, I got a letter where Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> told me that...
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Sun, May 8, 2005 2:03 pm, Petr Baudis said: > > > do you think you could also send the patches by mail, please? > > Yes, attached. But i'm hoping you'll accept them from my .git repository > so that I can keep my own repository consistent, without conflicts from my > own patches being pulled back in from you with different commit id's.
Different commit id's shouldn't make much difference w.r.t. conflicts.
> Is there a problem with just using cogito to manage the patches?
No problem if I decide to accept all of your patches. But that's what I need to find out by reviewing the patches, and when I have any comments, I want to point them out easily in the context of the patch.
From this viewpoint the cumulative patch you've sent is unfortunately useless - I need it broken to the commits, in separate mails, and either as text/plain attachments or inline, please.
Show 7 quoted lines
> >> What do you use to publish a repository? > > > > What do you mean? > > Well, I just copied the .git directory and everything under it up to the > website. But I wondered if there was a cg-push or something similar > which would handle things a little better. No biggy.
Nothing like that so far. It should be possible with the ssh protocol relatively easily, and doable with rsync (although the locking is going to be pretty be hard).
Thanks,
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor