Re: Re: A darcs that can pull from git

> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:12:59PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > > Do you have any plans/ideas for allowing pulls directly from a
> > > remote git repository?
> > 
> > I haven't thought about it yet.  Does anyone have any ideas about how
> > to efficiently pull from git without a complete local copy?
> 
> I don't think so.  My best thought so far would be to have something like a
> ~/.gitcache/, which would store the sha1 objects themselves, so at least
> we'd only end up with *one* local copy.  I'm actually curious what the true
> git people do about this--it would be nice to share a cache.  For darcs'
> purposes, we could prune the cache from time to time.  If we're running
> with a darcs backend, we really only need the recent versions of files and
> trees.
> 
> Do the git have any suggestions about how to avoid excess downloads or
> excess copies of a git repository? It seems to me like it would make sense
> to always download sha1s to ~/.gitcache/, and then hardlink them to the
> current git repository, so you wouldn't end up ever downloading the same
> sha1 twice.  Or we should use $GITCACHE/, to give the user some
> flexibility.  But perhaps this is an already-solved problem, and I've just
> not noticed...