Re: Re: A darcs that can pull from git
- From
David Roundy <droundy@abridgegame.org>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2005, 11:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050426110613.GB20723@abridgegame.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7i4qdusxdw.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:12:59PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > Do you have any plans/ideas for allowing pulls directly from a > > remote git repository? > > I haven't thought about it yet. Does anyone have any ideas about how > to efficiently pull from git without a complete local copy?
I don't think so. My best thought so far would be to have something like a ~/.gitcache/, which would store the sha1 objects themselves, so at least we'd only end up with *one* local copy. I'm actually curious what the true git people do about this--it would be nice to share a cache. For darcs' purposes, we could prune the cache from time to time. If we're running with a darcs backend, we really only need the recent versions of files and trees.
Do the git have any suggestions about how to avoid excess downloads or excess copies of a git repository? It seems to me like it would make sense to always download sha1s to ~/.gitcache/, and then hardlink them to the current git repository, so you wouldn't end up ever downloading the same sha1 twice. Or we should use $GITCACHE/, to give the user some flexibility. But perhaps this is an already-solved problem, and I've just not noticed...
As far as other details, currently we can just walk the tree to find out what files are needed, right?
-- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net