Re: SHA1 hash safety
- From
- David Meybohm <dmeybohmlkml@bellsouth.net>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2005, 18:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050420185653.GA3076@localhost>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504191848300.29929@cag.csail.mit.edu>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:48:57PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, David Meybohm wrote: > > >But doesn't this require assuming the distribution of MD5 is uniform, > >and don't the papers finding collisions in less show it's not? So, your > >birthday-argument for calculating the probability wouldn't apply, because > >it rests on the assumption MD5 is uniform, and it isn't. > > No, the collision papers don't show this at all.
I didn't mean they showed it directly. I meant by finding collisions in MD5 quickly, MD5 would have to have some non-uniformity. But that's nevertheless wrong because uniformness and collision finding ability aren't related. Sorry to have wasted everyone's time.
Dave