Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge?
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2005, 09:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050419092812.GE2393@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <4264CCFF.30400@dgreaves.com>
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got a letter where David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> told me that...
> What's the most common thing to do? pull or update?
update for normal users.
> which is easier to type? > what are people used to?
I think 'git up' is easier to type than 'git pull'. It's the CVS/SVN tradition, though, probably not the BK tradition.
> I'm not sure but I suggest that pull and get would be better choices. > > git pull > git get
I don't like git get; it is something completely new - not in CVS/SVN and means something completely different in BK, apparently.
> is it rare enough to justify: > git --download-only pull
Dunno. I do it personally all the time, with git at least.
What do others think? :-)
I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor