Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge?
- From
- Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2005, 10:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1113905110.1262.1.camel@nosferatu.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050419092812.GE2393@pasky.ji.cz>
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:28 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got a letter > where David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> told me that... > > Dunno. I do it personally all the time, with git at least. > > What do others think? :-) >
I think pull is pull. If you are doing lots of local stuff and do not want it overwritten, it should have been in a forked branch.
> I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it. >
-- Martin Schlemmer