Re: Re: Plug memory leak in update-cache.c
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2005, 00:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050416000436.GT7417@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <1113609621.8582.12.camel@nosferatu.lan>
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 02:00:21AM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org> told me that...
Show 32 quoted lines
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 01:48 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:53:50AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org> told me that...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Might not be that an big an issue as it should be freed on exit, but
> > > might cause problems with big trees.
> > >
> > > ----
> > >
> > > Plug memory leak in update-cache.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
> > >
> > > update-cache.c: 22f3ccd47db4f0888901109a8cbf883d272d1cba
> > > --- 22f3ccd47db4f0888901109a8cbf883d272d1cba/update-cache.c
> > > +++ uncommitted/update-cache.c
> > > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@
> > > printf("%s: needs update\n", ce->name);
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > + free(active_cache[i]);
> > > active_cache[i] = new;
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > FYI, new could've contained active_cache[i] at that time, so you needed
> > to check for that. Fixed though, thanks for pointing it out.
> >
>
> Urk, no, please drop. As Ingo pointed out, the memory was obtained via
> mmap ...Yes, I've just noticed that. ;-)
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor