Re: Naming the SCM (was Re: Handling renames.)
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2005, 20:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050414205329.GF22699@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <200504141442.17235.elenstev@mesatop.com>
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:42:16PM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com> told me that...
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 01:40 pm, Andrew Timberlake-Newell wrote: > > Zach Welch pontificated: > > > I imagine quite a few folks expect something not entirely unlike an SCM > > > to emerge from these current efforts. Moreover, Petr's 'git' scripts > > > wrap your "filesystem" plumbing to that very end. > > > > > > To avoid confusion, I think it would be better to distinguish the two > > > layers, perhaps by calling the low-level plumbing... 'gitfs', of course. > > > > Or perhaps to come up with a name (or at least nickname) for the SCM. > > > > GitMaster? > > > > Cogito. "Git inside" can be the first slogan.
What about tig?
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor