Re: Handling renames.
- From
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2005, 22:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1113518810.12012.256.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.21.0504141758310.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 18:23 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I personally think renames are a minor thing that doesn't happen > much. What actually happens, in my opinion, is that some chunk of a > file is moved to a different, possibly new, file. If this is supported > (as something that the SCM notices), then a rename is just a special > case where the moved chunk is a whole file.
Certainly we'd discussed the possibility that the 'rename' field may contain more than one destination, or more than one source filename. This could happen when a file is split into two, or when two files are merged into one, for example.
-- dwmw2