Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] log -G: Ignore binary files
- From
Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2018, 11:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1544218571.1651.1543404679825@ox.hosteurope.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <87k1l5zabd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> hat am 22. November 2018 um 11:16 geschrieben:
[...]
Show 11 quoted lines
> > > > +test_expect_success 'log -G ignores binary files' ' > > + rm -rf .git && > > + git init && > > + printf "a\0b" >data.bin && > > + git add data.bin && > > + git commit -m "message" && > > + git log -G a >result && > > Would be less confusing as "-Ga" since that's the invocation we > document, even though I see (but wasn't aware that...) "-G a" works too.
Done.
Show 38 quoted lines
> > + test_must_be_empty result
> > +'
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'log -G looks into binary files with textconv filter' '
> > + rm -rf .git &&
> > + git init &&
> > + echo "* diff=bin" > .gitattributes &&
> > + printf "a\0b" >data.bin &&
> > + git add data.bin &&
> > + git commit -m "message" &&
> > + git -c diff.bin.textconv=cat log -G a >actual &&
> > + git log >expected &&
> > + test_cmp actual expected
> > +'
> > +
> > test_done
>
> This patch seems like the wrong direction to me. In particular the
> assertion that "the concept of differences only makes sense for text
> files". That's just not true. This patch breaks this:
>
> (
> rm -rf /tmp/g-test &&
> git init /tmp/g-test &&
> cd /tmp/g-test &&
> for i in {1..10}; do
> echo "Always matching thensome 5" >file &&
> printf "a thensome %d binary \0" $i >>file &&
> git add file &&
> git commit -m"Bump $i"
> done &&
> git log -Gthensome.*5
> )
>
> Right now this will emit 3/10 patches, and the right ones! I.e. "Bump
> [156]". The 1st one because it introduces the "Always matching thensome
> 5". Then 5/6 because the add/remove the string "a thensome 5 binary",
> respectively. Which matches /thensome.*5/.log -p does not show you the patch text in your example because it is treated as binary. And currently "log -G" has a different opinion into what it looks and what it ignores. My patch tries to bring both more in line.
Show 34 quoted lines
> I.e. in the first one we do a regex match against the content here > because we don't have both sides: > https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.19.2/diffcore-pickaxe.c#L48-L53 > > And then for the later ones where we have both sides we end up in > diffgrep_consume(): > https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.19.2/diffcore-pickaxe.c#L27-L36 > > I think there may be a real issue here to address, which might be some > combination of: > > a) Even though the diffcore can do a binary diff internally, this is > not what it exposes with "-p", we just say "Binary files differ". > > I don't know how to emit the raw version we'll end up passing to > diffgrep_consume() in this case. Is it just --binary without the > encoding? I don't know... > > b) Your test case shows that you're matching a string at a \0 > boundary. Is this perhaps something you ran into? I.e. that we don't > have some -F version of -G so we can't supply regexes that match > past a \0? I had some related work on grep for this that hasn't been > carried over to the diffcore: > > git log --grep='grep:.*\\0' --author=Ævar > > c) Is this binary diff we end up matching against just bad in some > cases? I haven't dug but that wouldn't surprise me, i.e. that it's > trying to be line-based so we'll overmatch in many cases. > > So maybe this is something that should be passed down as a flag? See a > recent discussion at > https://public-inbox.org/git/87lg77cmr1.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ for how > that could be done.
It is not about the \0 boundary. v2 of the patches will clarify that. My main motiviation is to speed up "log -G" as that takes a considerable amount of time when it wades through MBs of binary files which change often. And in multiple places I can already treat binary files differently (e.g. turn off delta compression, skip trying to diff them, no EOL normalization). And for me making log -G ignore what git thinks are binary files is making the line clearer between what should be treated as binary and what as text.
Show 11 quoted lines
> Also if we don't have some tests already that were failing with this > patch we really should have those as "let's test the current behavior > first". Unfortunately tests in this area are really lacking, see > e.g. my: > > git log --author=Junio --min-parents=2 --grep=ab/.*grep > > For some series of patches to grep where to get one patch in I needed to > often lead with 5-10 test patches to convince reviewers that I knew what > I was changing, and also to be comfortable that I'd covered all the edge > cases we currently supported, but weren't testing for.
I'm happy to add more test cases to convince everyone involved :)