Re: Why doesn't merge fail if message has only sign-off?
- From
Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2017, 20:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1499198607.6428.9.camel@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq60f9mo6b.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 10:21 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> I think that it is not by design that it doesn't fail. It's not > like we decided to allow s-o-b only merge because we found a reason > why it is a good idea to do so. > > So I do not think anybody minds too deeply if somebody came up a > patch to "fix" it. It's just that nobody tried to create such a > silly merge in real life so far (I do not think you did, either--you > found this out by playing around trying to find corner cases, no?) >
Yes and no. I found this out while playing around with the "insert notes in the commit template" patch I sent previously. I wasn't trying to find corner cases, though.
-- Kaartic