Re: [PATCH] fetch: print an error when declining to request an unadvertised object
- From
Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
- Date
- Feb 19, 2017, 02:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1487470052.3570.7.camel@mattmccutchen.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq60kfezr9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 15:49 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The fact that we have the above two choices tells me that a two-step > approach may be an appropriate approach. [...]
> Even if you did only the first step, as long as the second step can > be done without reverting what the first step did [*4*] by somebody > who cares the "specific error" deeply enough, I am OK with that. Of > course if you did both steps, that is fine by me as well ;-)
I appreciate the flexibility, but now that I've spent the time to understand all the code involved, it would be a pity not to go for the complete solution. New patch coming.
Matt