Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] refs backend rebase on pu
- From
David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2016, 01:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1454548352.5545.2.camel@twopensource.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmvrhjpzc.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 16:09 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > > > David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes: > > > > > Are there any more reviews on this? I do have some changes from > > > this > > > set, but they're pretty minor so I don't want to post a new one > > > (unless > > > folks would rather see those changes before reviewing). Let me > > > know. > > > > Thanks for pinging. As this is a rather wide-ranging topic, it was > > not practical to intergrate with the rest of the topics in flight > > back then, but now it seems that this needs only one topic that > > still is in flight. I'll queue this on top of a merge between > > 'master' and the tip of 'sb/submodule-parallel-update' and include > > in the daily integration cycle to make it easy for people to view > > the changes in wider context as necessary. > > I've re-applied the patches to rebuild the topic; when merged to > 'pu' it seemed to break some tests, but I didn't look too deeply > into it.
They were working for me as-of the time I sent them. I guess something must have broken since. I'll rebase, test, and send a new series.