Re: new platform & S_IFGITLINK problem
- From
- Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Date
- May 4, 2010, 07:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1272957697.13488.1319.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005032035310.5478@i5.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 20:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > On Sat, 1 May 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Yes, that assumption is a gross POSIX violation but we so far haven't seen > > any platform that matters in real life that assigns the IFMT bits > > differently. > > Indeed. Just out of interest - Alan, what _is_ the crazy platform that > doesn't match what absolutely everybody else has always done?
You don't want to know :-)
But if you really must, it's an Atari platforms running FreeMiNT, but was also essentially Atari's own MultiTOS as well which they adopted from the original MiNT project.
Alan.