Re: [PATCH] git-daemon server
- From
- McMullan, Jason <jason.mcmullan@timesys.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2005, 16:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1117814982.32257.64.camel@jmcmullan.timesys>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506030856490.1876@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 09:02 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> ie it wouldn't be a deamon at all, it would be a foreground server. So I'd > call it just "git-server" or something.
Server.. Sounds ok. Will do.
> Anyway, technically this looks ok, but I'd hate to apply it until there is > something that actually uses it and an example of that usage.
Well, I use it to keep my home and work repos in sync, but yeah, users == 1 doesn't make a good case for inclusion.
I just want to have this out there, because I find rsync a little too heavy handed for my taste, and I'm still hesitant about the cg-rpush locking semantics.
-- Jason McMullan <jason.mcmullan@timesys.com> TimeSys Corporation