From: McMullan, Jason Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:09:41 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-daemon server Message-ID: <1117814982.32257.64.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> In-Reply-To: On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 09:02 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ie it wouldn't be a deamon at all, it would be a foreground server. So I'd > call it just "git-server" or something. Server.. Sounds ok. Will do. > Anyway, technically this looks ok, but I'd hate to apply it until there is > something that actually uses it and an example of that usage. Well, I use it to keep my home and work repos in sync, but yeah, users == 1 doesn't make a good case for inclusion. I just want to have this out there, because I find rsync a little too heavy handed for my taste, and I'm still hesitant about the cg-rpush locking semantics. -- Jason McMullan TimeSys Corporation