Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] utf8.c: avoid char overflow

> Hi Beat,
> 
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Beat Bolli wrote:
> 
>> In ISO C, char constants must be in the range -128..127. Change the 
>> BOM
>> constants to unsigned char to avoid overflow.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li>
>> ---
>>  utf8.c | 10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/utf8.c b/utf8.c
>> index d55e20c641..833ce00617 100644
>> --- a/utf8.c
>> +++ b/utf8.c
>> @@ -561,15 +561,15 @@ char *reencode_string_len(const char *in, int 
>> insz,
>>  #endif
>> 
>>  static int has_bom_prefix(const char *data, size_t len,
>> -			  const char *bom, size_t bom_len)
>> +			  const unsigned char *bom, size_t bom_len)
>>  {
>>  	return data && bom && (len >= bom_len) && !memcmp(data, bom, 
>> bom_len);
>>  }
>> 
>> -static const char utf16_be_bom[] = {0xFE, 0xFF};
>> -static const char utf16_le_bom[] = {0xFF, 0xFE};
>> -static const char utf32_be_bom[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0xFE, 0xFF};
>> -static const char utf32_le_bom[] = {0xFF, 0xFE, 0x00, 0x00};
>> +static const unsigned char utf16_be_bom[] = {0xFE, 0xFF};
>> +static const unsigned char utf16_le_bom[] = {0xFF, 0xFE};
>> +static const unsigned char utf32_be_bom[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0xFE, 0xFF};
>> +static const unsigned char utf32_le_bom[] = {0xFF, 0xFE, 0x00, 0x00};
> 
> An alternative approach that might be easier to read (and avoids the
> confusion arising from our use of (signed) chars for strings pretty 
> much
> everywhere):
> 
> #define FE ((char)0xfe)
> #define FF ((char)0xff)
> 
> ...