Re: Time to flush developer accumulated patches?
- From
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2008, 10:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <0B23B7DB-8AB2-4D8D-BE50-917651238353@wincent.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <e5bfff550801200210y212d0921x214773596810be52@mail.gmail.com>
El 20/1/2008, a las 11:10, Marco Costalba escribió:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Reading mailing list threads it is becoming common these days to hear > about contributors with patches ready to be sent as soon as 1.5.4 is > out. > > Would be a good idea to open a new branch new_stuff as a target for > this pending stuff? > > I understand that you want people focused on fixing bugs, but I also > understand that people don't ;-) > > Opening a new_stuff branch could have the following benefits: > > - Give more time to fix bugs before 1.5.4 is out without stopping > people from having fun and reduce the pressure to release. > > - Reduce the merging impact when master reopens because patches are > already merged in new_stuff and developers have already taken care of > conflicts > > - Do not slow down the wheel: I can develop some patches and keep them > myself, but until are not discussed in the list and eventually got in > master has little meaning to continue develop additional stuff. > > - Perhaps it's lack of reviewing time on your side that worries you > (as is normal because we are on bug fixes mode in master) but upgrade > from new_stuff to master would be not automatic nor guaranteed but at > least people have an idea at what's going on and can keep contributing > in code and ideas.
We already have two such branches: next and pu.
Here's an old version of a mail from Junio describing the different branches; I know he's sent out newer ones but this it he one that I could lay my hands on:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/39954
Cheers, Wincent