RE: [Test Breakage 2.46.0-rc0] Test t0021.35 fails on NonStop

From: rsbecker@nexbridge.com <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Date: Jul 15, 2024, 19:03 UTC
Message-ID: <00cb01dad6e9$a73085b0$f5919110$@nexbridge.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsewa33pc.fsf@gitster.g>

On Monday, July 15, 2024 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

><rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
>
>>>As I speculated earlier in an earlier message, the breakage you
>>>reported
>> may have to
>>>do with interaction between "local" and use of a subshell, and perhaps
>>>we
>> can also
>>>check that pattern in the test.
>>
>> That is that I am also suggesting but did not say it as precisely.

Thanks.

>
>Oh, I see.  Are you volunteering to come up with a minimum addition to

t0000.1

>then?

I'll have to give this some thought on the best way to verify local that does not break the various other shells. I only have a limited set (ksh, bash). Maybe someone with a linux system might be in a better position.