James Cloos
Posts as cloos@jhcloos.com.
35
messages
2
patches posted
0%
of 1 series merged
7
threads started
2005
first message, Aug 28, 2005
Jun 7, 2015
since the latest message
Patch series
Of 1 patch series (re-rolls counted once), 0 landed on master and 1 did not.
- not mergedImprove progress display in kB range.Apr 19, 2009
A series is merged when one of its patches matches a commit on master by the same author, by subject. Versions are linked when they share a patch subject. Patches reworded before landing, or applied under someone else's name, count as not merged.
Recent emails
- Packing speed
- Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] http: try standard proxy env vars when http.proxy config option is not set
- Re: git fails on large repo clone on intermittent, or intermittently-high-latency, connections
- Commit performance, or lack thereof
- Re: [RFC PATCH] builtin-log: Add options to --coverletter
- Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Improve progress display in kB range.
- Improve progress display in kB range.
- Improve progress display in kB range.
- Re: how to check remote git repo for updates without pull/fetch
- Re: how to check remote git repo for updates without pull/fetch
- Re: ls-files
- ls-files [Was: Re: Fwd: git status options feature suggestion]
- Re: git-fetch vs ipv6 routing issues
- Re: git-fetch vs ipv6 routing issues
- git-fetch vs ipv6 routing issues
- Re: parsecvs repository moved...
- rcs import?
- Re: Distribution of longest common hash prefixes
- Re: Distribution of longest common hash prefixes
- Re: Distribution of longest common hash prefixes
- Re: [PATCH] Dissociating a repository from its alternates
- Re: Errors GITtifying GCC and Binutils
- Re: efficient cloning