Andrew Pimlott
Posts as andrew@pimlott.net.
22
messages
4
patches posted
33%
of 3 series merged
6
threads started
2010
first message, Jul 1, 2010
Jul 1, 2013
since the latest message
Patch series
Of 3 patch series (re-rolls counted once), 1 landed on master and 2 did not.
- mergedlib-rebase: document exec_ in FAKE_LINESJul 1, 2013, 296fa99334
- not mergedlib-rebase: use write_scriptJun 27, 2013
- not mergedrebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!Jun 14, 2013
A series is merged when one of its patches matches a commit on master by the same author, by subject. Versions are linked when they share a patch subject. Patches reworded before landing, or applied under someone else's name, count as not merged.
Recent emails
- Re: [PATCH] t7500: fix flipped actual/expect
- Re: [PATCH] lib-rebase: use write_script
- t7500: fix flipped actual/expect
- lib-rebase: document exec_ in FAKE_LINES
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] lib-rebase: use write_script
- lib-rebase: use write_script
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- rebase -i: fixup fixup! fixup!
- rebase --autosquash does not handle fixup! of fixup!
- --simplify-by-decoration, but include branch points
- git patch-id fails on long lines
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: 'cherry' does not cope well with merges from upstream
- Re: git cherry not marking commits with equivalent upstream
- Re: git cherry not marking commits with equivalent upstream
- git cherry not marking commits with equivalent upstream