Re: [PATCH GSoC] repo: Remove unnecessary variable shadow
JAYATHEERTH K <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com> writes:
> I got a review on this patch,
> if no one has an issue I wanted to remind it for the next cycle.
Thanks.
An easier way to ping is to resubmit exactly the same patch, with reviewed-by: or acked-by: trailer crediting the reviewer. We have 2000+ messages in 4 weeks, so "I got a review on this patch" without a pointer is much less useful to verify what feedback came to the thread from whom. FYI here are from the headers of the message I am responding to.
References: <20260223135248.127935-1-jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+rGoLeppg4Xaoqg6+SZ=ET=ze6rXUbmjLm5UvmitmRGm9u6ag@mail.gmail.com>The reference points at the patch itself, and just like Git commits do not have pointers to their children, the original patch message has no links to reviews on it X-<.
I'll commit this with the following change now.
Thanks.
1: 006c49ee01 ! 1: a66c8c7f91 repo: Remove unnecessary variable shadow
@@ Metadata
Author: K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com>
## Commit message ##
- repo: Remove unnecessary variable shadow
+ repo: remove unnecessary variable shadow
Avoid redeclaring `entry` inside the conditional block, removing
unnecessary variable shadowing and improving code clarity without
changing behavior.
Signed-off-by: K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com>
+ Acked-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
## builtin/repo.c ##