Re: [PATCH 2/2] builtin: use git_read_line_interactively to prompt
Firmin Martin <firminmartin24@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/am.c b/builtin/am.c
> index 8355e3566f..32eae4eb2e 100644
> --- a/builtin/am.c
> +++ b/builtin/am.c
> @@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@ static int do_interactive(struct am_state *state)
> assert(state->msg);
>
> for (;;) {
> - char reply[64];
> + struct strbuf reply = STRBUF_INIT;If you call this reply_strbuf, and introduce "const char *reply", and ...
Show 9 quoted lines
> puts(_("Commit Body is:"));
> puts("--------------------------");
> @@ -1656,17 +1656,17 @@ static int do_interactive(struct am_state *state)
> * input at this point.
> */
> printf(_("Apply? [y]es/[n]o/[e]dit/[v]iew patch/[a]ccept all: "));
> - if (!fgets(reply, sizeof(reply), stdin))
> + if (git_read_line_interactively(&reply) == EOF)
> die("unable to read from stdin; aborting");... assign "reply = reply_strbuf.buf" here, you do not have to change anything below.
> - if (*reply == 'y' || *reply == 'Y') {
> + if (reply.len && !strncasecmp(reply.buf, "yes", reply.len)) {And we shouldn't sneak an unrelated change like this into a patch whose purpose is to allow reading from the standard input instead of always from "/dev/tty".
As I explained earlier, git_read_line_interactively() is usable only when we know that the standard input is *not* used for the data we are operating on and is available to be used for simulating interactive input. Since "git am -i" never reads the mailbox from the standard input, the use of the helper here is acceptable.
Show 21 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> index 1fdb7d9d10..134347eb39 100644
> --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int decide_next(const struct bisect_terms *terms,
>
> if (missing_good && !missing_bad &&
> !strcmp(current_term, terms->term_good)) {
> - char *yesno;
> + struct strbuf yesno = STRBUF_INIT;
> /*
> * have bad (or new) but not good (or old). We could bisect
> * although this is less optimum.
> @@ -353,8 +353,9 @@ static int decide_next(const struct bisect_terms *terms,
> * translation. The program will only accept English input
> * at this point.
> */
> - yesno = git_prompt(_("Are you sure [Y/n]? "), PROMPT_ECHO);
> - if (starts_with(yesno, "N") || starts_with(yesno, "n"))
> + printf(_("Are you sure [Y/n]? "));
> + git_read_line_interactively(&yesno);The use of this helper here is also OK as the standard input to "git bisect" is available for simulating interactive input.
> + if (yesno.len && !strncasecmp(yesno.buf, "no", yesno.len))
> return -1;
> return 0;
> }
It may make sense to have a thin wrapper around this pattern, e.g.
static int ask_yesno(const char *question)
{
struct strbuf answer = STRBUF_INIT;
printf("%s [Y/n]? ", question);
git_read_line_interactively(&answer);
return !(answer.buf[0] == 'N' || answer.buf[0] == 'n');
}so that the above caller can become
return ask_yesno(_("Are you sure")) ? 0 : -1;and ...
Show 7 quoted lines
> - yesno = git_prompt(_("Do you want me to do it for you "
> - "[Y/n]? "), PROMPT_ECHO);
> - res = tolower(*yesno) == 'n' ?
> + printf(_("Do you want me to do it for you [Y/n]? "));
> + git_read_line_interactively(&yesno);
> + res = (yesno.len && strncasecmp(yesno.buf, "no", yesno.len)) ?
> -1 : bisect_start(terms, empty_strvec, 0);... this caller can become
if (ask_yesno(_("Do you want me to do it for you")))
res = bisect_start(terms, empty_strvec, 0);
else
res = -1;Thanks.
Firmin Martin
