threads / patch / 53016

patch, 3 partsconfigure: respect --without-<package> flags

Subject: [PATCH 0/3] configure: respect --without-<package> flags

## tl;dr

14 messages between Mar 18, 2020 and Mar 27, 2020. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 13people: 4as markdown or json

Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 18, 2020, 07:36 UTC · lore

Current git's configure script allow --without-<package>, it rightfully set NO_<PACKAGE> in the beginning of the configure script, but overwrite them with autodetect later.

Respect them now.
P/S: I'm not sure about the change to NO_OPENSSL
Đoàn Trần Công Danh (3):
  configure: respect --without-curl flags
  configure: respect --without-expat
  configure: respect --without-openssl
 configure.ac | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 18, 2020, 07:38 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH 1/3] configure: respect --without-curl flags

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Show changes to configure.ac +6 −2
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 66aedb9288..f4742878c0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ fi
 # git-http-push are not built, and you cannot use http:// and https://
 # transports.
 
+# Respect --without-curl
+if test "x$NO_CURL" != "xYesPlease"; then
+
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
 AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
@@ -600,8 +603,6 @@ AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
-GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
-
 if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
 
 AC_CHECK_PROG([CURL_CONFIG], [curl-config],
@@ -622,6 +623,9 @@ fi
 
 fi
 
+fi
+
+GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
 
 #
 # Define NO_EXPAT if you do not have expat installed.  git-http-push is
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Eric Sunshine· Mar 18, 2020, 15:51 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/3] configure: respect --without-curl flags

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:38 AM Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> @@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ fi
>  # Define NO_CURL if you do not have libcurl installed.  git-http-pull and
>  # git-http-push are not built, and you cannot use http:// and https://
>  # transports.
>
> +# Respect --without-curl
> +if test "x$NO_CURL" != "xYesPlease"; then
> ...
>  if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then

I realize that GIT_PARSE_WITH() will either clear NO_CURL or set it to literal "YesPlease", but the comment(s) in this file describing NO_CURL say only to _define_ it to build without curl support. So, I'm wondering if it would make more sense to take a looser view about the value of NO_CURL. The existing check of NO_CURL doesn't bother looking for a specific value, but instead just tests whether it has a value or not. Perhaps the new check can be modeled after that one.

Also, I think you can reduce the scope of this change quite a bit by merely wrapping the AC_CHECK_LIB() invocation. So, either:

    ...
    if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
    GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
    AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
    [NO_CURL=],
    [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
    GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
    fi
    GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
    ...
or even:
    ...
    if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
    AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
    [NO_CURL=],
    [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
    fi
    ...
Same comments applies to the other patches, as well.
Danh Doan· Mar 19, 2020, 03:19 UTC · re: Eric Sunshine · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/3] configure: respect --without-curl flags

On 2020-03-18 11:51:34-0400, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
Show 49 quoted lines
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:38 AM Đoàn Trần Công Danh
> <congdanhqx@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > @@ -592,6 +592,9 @@ fi
> >  # Define NO_CURL if you do not have libcurl installed.  git-http-pull and
> >  # git-http-push are not built, and you cannot use http:// and https://
> >  # transports.
> >
> > +# Respect --without-curl
> > +if test "x$NO_CURL" != "xYesPlease"; then
> > ...
> >  if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
> 
> I realize that GIT_PARSE_WITH() will either clear NO_CURL or set it to
> literal "YesPlease", but the comment(s) in this file describing
> NO_CURL say only to _define_ it to build without curl support. So, I'm
> wondering if it would make more sense to take a looser view about the
> value of NO_CURL. The existing check of NO_CURL doesn't bother looking
> for a specific value, but instead just tests whether it has a value or
> not. Perhaps the new check can be modeled after that one.
> 
> Also, I think you can reduce the scope of this change quite a bit by
> merely wrapping the AC_CHECK_LIB() invocation. So, either:
> 
>     ...
>     if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
>     GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
> 
>     AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
>     [NO_CURL=],
>     [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
> 
>     GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
>     fi
> 
>     GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
>     ...
> 
> or even:
> 
>     ...
>     if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
>     AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
>     [NO_CURL=],
>     [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
>     fi
>     ...
> 
> Same comments applies to the other patches, as well.
I've re-checked the configure.ac code.
We've already use:
	test -z "$NO_ICONV"

I think rewrite like your suggestion would be better choice, and it'll be consistence with the current code.

I'll send a reroll after checking what should be done with NO_OPENSSL.
-- 
Danh
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 18, 2020, 07:38 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH 2/3] configure: respect --without-expat

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Show changes to configure.ac +5 −0
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index f4742878c0..7468eb6bc8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -631,6 +631,9 @@ GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
 # Define NO_EXPAT if you do not have expat installed.  git-http-push is
 # not built, and you cannot push using http:// and https:// transports.
 
+# Respect --without-expat
+if test "x$NO_EXPAT" != xYesPlease; then
+
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
 AC_CHECK_LIB([expat], [XML_ParserCreate],
@@ -639,6 +642,8 @@ AC_CHECK_LIB([expat], [XML_ParserCreate],
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
+fi
+
 GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_EXPAT])
 
 #
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 18, 2020, 07:38 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Show changes to configure.ac +9 −3
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 7468eb6bc8..20a11e1f32 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
 AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
 [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
-[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
- [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
- [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
+[
+if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
+	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
+else
+	AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
+	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
+	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])
+fi
+])
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
brian m. carlson· Mar 18, 2020, 11:22 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl

On 2020-03-18 at 07:38:02, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
> ---
>  configure.ac | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 7468eb6bc8..20a11e1f32 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
>  
>  AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
>  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
> -[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
> +[
> +if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
> +	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])

I don't see this in the original. Wouldn't we want to fall back to the default in this case, which would be SHA1DC?

-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Danh Doan· Mar 18, 2020, 11:34 UTC · re: brian m. carlson · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl

On 2020-03-18 11:22:13+0000, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> On 2020-03-18 at 07:38:02, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  configure.ac | 12 +++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 7468eb6bc8..20a11e1f32 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
> >  
> >  AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
> >  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
> > -[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
> > +[
> > +if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
> > +	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
> 
> I don't see this in the original.  Wouldn't we want to fall back to the
> default in this case, which would be SHA1DC?
This block of code will be run into in macOS only.

Really, I wasn't sure what should be done in this case (I mentioned in the cover letter).

Should we set:
	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
	NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease
in this case instead?
-- 
Danh
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 19, 2020, 03:58 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH v2 0/3] configure: respect --without-<package> flags

Current git's configure script allow --without-<package>, it rightfully set NO_<PACKAGE> in the beginning of the configure script, but overwrite them with autodetect later.

Respect them now.
Change from v1:
- Simply check if NO_<PACKAGE> is empty or not instead of explicitly
  check for YesPlease
- --without-openssl will ignore libcrypto all-together and fallback
  into DC_SHA1
Đoàn Trần Công Danh (3):
  configure: respect --without-curl flag
  configure: respect --without-expat flag
  configure: respect --without-openssl flag
 configure.ac | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
Interdiff against v1:
Show changes to configure.ac +16 −18
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 20a11e1f32..807bb8bc5a 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -542,17 +542,18 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([CHECKS for libraries])
 
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
+if test -z "$NO_OPENSSL"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
 [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
-[
-if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
-	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
+[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
+ [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
+ [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
 else
-	AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
-	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
-	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])
+	# Fallback to DC SHA1
+	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
+	DC_SHA1=YesPlease
+	GIT_CONF_SUBST([DC_SHA1])
 fi
-])
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
@@ -598,17 +599,19 @@ fi
 # git-http-push are not built, and you cannot use http:// and https://
 # transports.
 
-# Respect --without-curl
-if test "x$NO_CURL" != "xYesPlease"; then
-
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
+# Respect --without-curl
+if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
 [NO_CURL=],
 [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
+fi
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
+GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
+
 if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
 
 AC_CHECK_PROG([CURL_CONFIG], [curl-config],
@@ -629,27 +632,22 @@ fi
 
 fi
 
-fi
-
-GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
 
 #
 # Define NO_EXPAT if you do not have expat installed.  git-http-push is
 # not built, and you cannot push using http:// and https:// transports.
 
-# Respect --without-expat
-if test "x$NO_EXPAT" != xYesPlease; then
-
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
+# Respect --without-expat
+if test -z "$NO_EXPAT"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([expat], [XML_ParserCreate],
 [NO_EXPAT=],
 [NO_EXPAT=YesPlease])
+fi
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
-fi
-
 GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_EXPAT])
 
 #
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 19, 2020, 03:58 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH v2 1/3] configure: respect --without-curl flag

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Show changes to configure.ac +3 −0
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 66aedb9288..5a73a592e1 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -594,9 +594,12 @@ fi
 
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
+# Respect --without-curl
+if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
 [NO_CURL=],
 [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
+fi
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
 
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 19, 2020, 03:58 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH v2 2/3] configure: respect --without-expat flag

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Show changes to configure.ac +3 −0
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 5a73a592e1..896996e177 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -632,9 +632,12 @@ fi
 
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
+# Respect --without-expat
+if test -z "$NO_EXPAT"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([expat], [XML_ParserCreate],
 [NO_EXPAT=],
 [NO_EXPAT=YesPlease])
+fi
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
 
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Đoàn Trần Công Danh· Mar 19, 2020, 03:58 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

[PATCH v2 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl flag

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
---
 configure.ac | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
Show changes to configure.ac +7 −0
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 896996e177..807bb8bc5a 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -542,11 +542,18 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([CHECKS for libraries])
 
 GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
+if test -z "$NO_OPENSSL"; then
 AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
 [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
 [AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
+else
+	# Fallback to DC SHA1
+	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
+	DC_SHA1=YesPlease
+	GIT_CONF_SUBST([DC_SHA1])
+fi
 
 GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
 
-- 
2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
Danh Doan· Mar 26, 2020, 12:23 UTC · re: Đoàn Trần Công Danh · lore

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] configure: respect --without-<package> flags

On 2020-03-19 10:58:54+0700, Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Current git's configure script allow --without-<package>,
> it rightfully set NO_<PACKAGE> in the beginning of the configure script,
> but overwrite them with autodetect later.
> 
> Respect them now.
Hi Junio,
Can I get your opinion on this serie?

I didn't see it in cooking list. I guess it was lost because of 2.26.

Show 103 quoted lines
> 
> Change from v1:
> - Simply check if NO_<PACKAGE> is empty or not instead of explicitly
>   check for YesPlease
> - --without-openssl will ignore libcrypto all-together and fallback
>   into DC_SHA1
> 
> Đoàn Trần Công Danh (3):
>   configure: respect --without-curl flag
>   configure: respect --without-expat flag
>   configure: respect --without-openssl flag
> 
>  configure.ac | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> Interdiff against v1:
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 20a11e1f32..807bb8bc5a 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -542,17 +542,18 @@ AC_MSG_NOTICE([CHECKS for libraries])
>  
>  GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
>  
> +if test -z "$NO_OPENSSL"; then
>  AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
>  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
> -[
> -if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
> -	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
> +[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> + [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> + [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
>  else
> -	AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> -	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> -	[NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])
> +	# Fallback to DC SHA1
> +	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
> +	DC_SHA1=YesPlease
> +	GIT_CONF_SUBST([DC_SHA1])
>  fi
> -])
>  
>  GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
>  
> @@ -598,17 +599,19 @@ fi
>  # git-http-push are not built, and you cannot use http:// and https://
>  # transports.
>  
> -# Respect --without-curl
> -if test "x$NO_CURL" != "xYesPlease"; then
> -
>  GIT_STASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
>  
> +# Respect --without-curl
> +if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
>  AC_CHECK_LIB([curl], [curl_global_init],
>  [NO_CURL=],
>  [NO_CURL=YesPlease])
> +fi
>  
>  GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($CURLDIR)
>  
> +GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
> +
>  if test -z "$NO_CURL"; then
>  
>  AC_CHECK_PROG([CURL_CONFIG], [curl-config],
> @@ -629,27 +632,22 @@ fi
>  
>  fi
>  
> -fi
> -
> -GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_CURL])
>  
>  #
>  # Define NO_EXPAT if you do not have expat installed.  git-http-push is
>  # not built, and you cannot push using http:// and https:// transports.
>  
> -# Respect --without-expat
> -if test "x$NO_EXPAT" != xYesPlease; then
> -
>  GIT_STASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
>  
> +# Respect --without-expat
> +if test -z "$NO_EXPAT"; then
>  AC_CHECK_LIB([expat], [XML_ParserCreate],
>  [NO_EXPAT=],
>  [NO_EXPAT=YesPlease])
> +fi
>  
>  GIT_UNSTASH_FLAGS($EXPATDIR)
>  
> -fi
> -
>  GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_EXPAT])
>  
>  #
> -- 
> 2.26.0.rc2.234.g969ad452ca
> 
-- 
Danh
Junio C Hamano· Mar 27, 2020, 18:29 UTC · re: Danh Doan · lore

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] configure: respect --without-<package> flags

Danh Doan <congdanhqx@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On 2020-03-19 10:58:54+0700, Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Current git's configure script allow --without-<package>,
>> it rightfully set NO_<PACKAGE> in the beginning of the configure script,
>> but overwrite them with autodetect later.
>> 
>> Respect them now.
>
> Hi Junio,
>
> Can I get your opinion on this serie?

I do not have opinion on everything ;-) If you sent it during the pre-release freeze, it is very possible that I totally ignored it, especially if nobody showed interest in the topic.

Not limited to this topic, but I'd prefer to see leftover topics reappear after the tip of 'next' gets rewind.

Thanks.

← back to recent threads