threads / patch / 52256

patch, 2 partsMore fetch_if_missing=0 removal

Subject: [PATCH 0/2] More fetch_if_missing=0 removal

## tl;dr

5 messages between Nov 13, 2019 and Nov 13, 2019. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 4people: 2as markdown or json

Jonathan Tan· Nov 13, 2019, 00:34 UTC · lore
This is based on jt/fetch-remove-lazy-fetch-plugging.

This patch set both uses the work in commit 6462d5eb9a ("fetch: remove fetch_if_missing=0", 2019-11-08) and covers up some of the edge use cases that the aforementioned commit did not cover.

Junio wrote in [1]:
> What I am not certain about is if we are ready
> to move to the right direction for the longer term, or we should still
> be relying on the big-hammer global bit for expediency a bit longer.

I'm not sure if this patch set is an argument for or against. I did think 6462d5eb9a would be sufficient (but as these patches prove, it was not), but at the same time, with the additional test coverage provided by these patches, the overall work might be worth cooking in next. (Whenever, at $DAY_JOB, we encounter an edge case with partial clone, we have been submitting patches with test cases for "git fetch" or "git clone" but sometimes not both, so between 6462d5eb9a and this patch set, these edge cases would be covered too.)

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqh83s8h3m.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
Jonathan Tan (2):
  clone: remove fetch_if_missing=0
  promisor-remote: remove fetch_if_missing=0
 builtin/clone.c   |  3 ---
 connected.c       |  3 ++-
 fetch-pack.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 promisor-remote.c |  3 ---
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
-- 
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Jonathan Tan· Nov 13, 2019, 00:34 UTC · re: Jonathan Tan · lore

[PATCH 1/2] clone: remove fetch_if_missing=0

Commit 6462d5eb9a ("fetch: remove fetch_if_missing=0", 2019-11-08) strove to remove the need for fetch_if_missing=0 from the fetching mechanism, so it is plausible to attempt removing fetch_if_missing=0 from clone as well. But doing so reveals a bug - when the server does not send an object directly pointed to by a ref, this should be an error, not a trigger for a lazy fetch. (This case in the fetching mechanism was covered by a test using "git clone", not "git fetch", which is why the aforementioned commit didn't uncover the bug.)

The bug can be fixed by suppressing lazy-fetching during the connectivity check. Fix this bug, and remove fetch_if_missing from clone.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
---
 builtin/clone.c | 3 ---
 connected.c     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Show changes to 2 files +2 −4

builtin/clone.c, connected.c

diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c
index c46ee29f0a..8bf12ce5e3 100644
--- a/builtin/clone.c
+++ b/builtin/clone.c
@@ -927,8 +927,6 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 
 	struct argv_array ref_prefixes = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 
-	fetch_if_missing = 0;
-
 	packet_trace_identity("clone");
 	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, builtin_clone_options,
 			     builtin_clone_usage, 0);
@@ -1265,7 +1263,6 @@ int cmd_clone(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 	}
 
 	junk_mode = JUNK_LEAVE_REPO;
-	fetch_if_missing = 1;
 	err = checkout(submodule_progress);
 
 	strbuf_release(&reflog_msg);
diff --git a/connected.c b/connected.c
index 36c4e5dedb..c337f5f7f4 100644
--- a/connected.c
+++ b/connected.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data,
 		 * received the objects pointed to by each wanted ref.
 		 */
 		do {
-			if (!repo_has_object_file(the_repository, &oid))
+			if (!repo_has_object_file_with_flags(the_repository, &oid,
+							     OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT))
 				return 1;
 		} while (!fn(cb_data, &oid));
 		return 0;
-- 
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Junio C Hamano· Nov 13, 2019, 02:50 UTC · re: Jonathan Tan · lore

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: remove fetch_if_missing=0

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/connected.c b/connected.c
> index 36c4e5dedb..c337f5f7f4 100644
> --- a/connected.c
> +++ b/connected.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data,
>  		 * received the objects pointed to by each wanted ref.
>  		 */
>  		do {
> -			if (!repo_has_object_file(the_repository, &oid))
> +			if (!repo_has_object_file_with_flags(the_repository, &oid,
> +							     OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT))

Wow, good find. Really good find. I guess the exercise to see if we can get rid of (or at least use less of) the big knob was a good idea.

Thanks, will queue.
>  				return 1;
>  		} while (!fn(cb_data, &oid));
>  		return 0;
Jonathan Tan· Nov 13, 2019, 00:34 UTC · re: Jonathan Tan · lore

[PATCH 2/2] promisor-remote: remove fetch_if_missing=0

Commit 6462d5eb9a ("fetch: remove fetch_if_missing=0", 2019-11-08) strove to remove the need for fetch_if_missing=0 from the fetching mechanism, so it is plausible to attempt removing fetch_if_missing=0 from the lazy-fetching mechanism in promisor-remote as well.

But doing so reveals a bug - when the server does not send an object pointed to by a tag object, an infinite loop occurs: Git attempts to fetch the missing object, which causes a deferencing of all refs (for negotiation), which causes a lazy fetch of that missing object, and so on. This bug is because of unnecessary use of the fetch negotiator during lazy fetching - it is not used after initialization, but it is still initialized (which causes the dereferencing of all refs).

Thus, when the negotiator is not used during fetching, refrain from initializing it. Then, remove fetch_if_missing from promisor-remote.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
---
 fetch-pack.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 promisor-remote.c |  3 ---
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Show changes to 2 files +32 −17

fetch-pack.c, promisor-remote.c

diff --git a/fetch-pack.c b/fetch-pack.c
index 37178e2d34..490b111822 100644
--- a/fetch-pack.c
+++ b/fetch-pack.c
@@ -896,8 +896,15 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 	struct object_id oid;
 	const char *agent_feature;
 	int agent_len;
-	struct fetch_negotiator negotiator;
-	fetch_negotiator_init(r, &negotiator);
+	struct fetch_negotiator negotiator_alloc;
+	struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator;
+
+	if (args->no_dependents) {
+		negotiator = NULL;
+	} else {
+		negotiator = &negotiator_alloc;
+		fetch_negotiator_init(r, negotiator);
+	}
 
 	sort_ref_list(&ref, ref_compare_name);
 	QSORT(sought, nr_sought, cmp_ref_by_name);
@@ -984,7 +991,7 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 		die(_("Server does not support --deepen"));
 
 	if (!args->no_dependents) {
-		mark_complete_and_common_ref(&negotiator, args, &ref);
+		mark_complete_and_common_ref(negotiator, args, &ref);
 		filter_refs(args, &ref, sought, nr_sought);
 		if (everything_local(args, &ref)) {
 			packet_flush(fd[1]);
@@ -993,7 +1000,7 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 	} else {
 		filter_refs(args, &ref, sought, nr_sought);
 	}
-	if (find_common(&negotiator, args, fd, &oid, ref) < 0)
+	if (find_common(negotiator, args, fd, &oid, ref) < 0)
 		if (!args->keep_pack)
 			/* When cloning, it is not unusual to have
 			 * no common commit.
@@ -1013,7 +1020,8 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 		die(_("git fetch-pack: fetch failed."));
 
  all_done:
-	negotiator.release(&negotiator);
+	if (negotiator)
+		negotiator->release(negotiator);
 	return ref;
 }
 
@@ -1231,7 +1239,8 @@ static int process_acks(struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator,
 				struct commit *commit;
 				oidset_insert(common, &oid);
 				commit = lookup_commit(the_repository, &oid);
-				negotiator->ack(negotiator, commit);
+				if (negotiator)
+					negotiator->ack(negotiator, commit);
 			}
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -1383,8 +1392,16 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack_v2(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 	struct packet_reader reader;
 	int in_vain = 0, negotiation_started = 0;
 	int haves_to_send = INITIAL_FLUSH;
-	struct fetch_negotiator negotiator;
-	fetch_negotiator_init(r, &negotiator);
+	struct fetch_negotiator negotiator_alloc;
+	struct fetch_negotiator *negotiator;
+
+	if (args->no_dependents) {
+		negotiator = NULL;
+	} else {
+		negotiator = &negotiator_alloc;
+		fetch_negotiator_init(r, negotiator);
+	}
+
 	packet_reader_init(&reader, fd[0], NULL, 0,
 			   PACKET_READ_CHOMP_NEWLINE |
 			   PACKET_READ_DIE_ON_ERR_PACKET);
@@ -1408,15 +1425,15 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack_v2(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 
 			/* Filter 'ref' by 'sought' and those that aren't local */
 			if (!args->no_dependents) {
-				mark_complete_and_common_ref(&negotiator, args, &ref);
+				mark_complete_and_common_ref(negotiator, args, &ref);
 				filter_refs(args, &ref, sought, nr_sought);
 				if (everything_local(args, &ref))
 					state = FETCH_DONE;
 				else
 					state = FETCH_SEND_REQUEST;
 
-				mark_tips(&negotiator, args->negotiation_tips);
-				for_each_cached_alternate(&negotiator,
+				mark_tips(negotiator, args->negotiation_tips);
+				for_each_cached_alternate(negotiator,
 							  insert_one_alternate_object);
 			} else {
 				filter_refs(args, &ref, sought, nr_sought);
@@ -1430,7 +1447,7 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack_v2(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 						    "negotiation_v2",
 						    the_repository);
 			}
-			if (send_fetch_request(&negotiator, fd[1], args, ref,
+			if (send_fetch_request(negotiator, fd[1], args, ref,
 					       &common,
 					       &haves_to_send, &in_vain,
 					       reader.use_sideband))
@@ -1440,7 +1457,7 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack_v2(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 			break;
 		case FETCH_PROCESS_ACKS:
 			/* Process ACKs/NAKs */
-			switch (process_acks(&negotiator, &reader, &common)) {
+			switch (process_acks(negotiator, &reader, &common)) {
 			case 2:
 				state = FETCH_GET_PACK;
 				break;
@@ -1475,7 +1492,8 @@ static struct ref *do_fetch_pack_v2(struct fetch_pack_args *args,
 		}
 	}
 
-	negotiator.release(&negotiator);
+	if (negotiator)
+		negotiator->release(negotiator);
 	oidset_clear(&common);
 	return ref;
 }
diff --git a/promisor-remote.c b/promisor-remote.c
index 9bd5b79d59..9f338c945f 100644
--- a/promisor-remote.c
+++ b/promisor-remote.c
@@ -16,10 +16,8 @@ static int fetch_refs(const char *remote_name, struct ref *ref)
 {
 	struct remote *remote;
 	struct transport *transport;
-	int original_fetch_if_missing = fetch_if_missing;
 	int res;
 
-	fetch_if_missing = 0;
 	remote = remote_get(remote_name);
 	if (!remote->url[0])
 		die(_("Remote with no URL"));
@@ -28,7 +26,6 @@ static int fetch_refs(const char *remote_name, struct ref *ref)
 	transport_set_option(transport, TRANS_OPT_FROM_PROMISOR, "1");
 	transport_set_option(transport, TRANS_OPT_NO_DEPENDENTS, "1");
 	res = transport_fetch_refs(transport, ref);
-	fetch_if_missing = original_fetch_if_missing;
 
 	return res;
 }
-- 
2.24.0.rc1.363.gb1bccd3e3d-goog
Junio C Hamano· Nov 13, 2019, 02:49 UTC · re: Jonathan Tan · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fetch_if_missing=0 removal

Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
> (Whenever, at $DAY_JOB, we encounter an edge case with partial clone, we
> have been submitting patches with test cases for "git fetch" or "git
> clone" but sometimes not both, so between 6462d5eb9a and this patch set,
> these edge cases would be covered too.)
Thanks, wonderful.

← back to recent threads