Re: [PATCH 1/1] t7519-status-fsmonitor: improve comments
On 10/16/19 12:35 PM, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 38 quoted lines
> From: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
>
> The comments for the staging/unstaging test did not accurately
> describe the scenario being tested. It is not essential that
> the test files being staged/unstaged appear at the end of the
> index. All that is required is that the test files are not
> flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID and have a position in the
> index greater than the number of entries in the index after
> unstaging.
>
> The comment for this test has been updated to be more
> accurate with respect to the scenario that's being tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
> ---
> t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> index d8df990972..997d5fb349 100755
> --- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> @@ -354,9 +354,11 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> -# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index. Test
> -# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
> -test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> +# Test unstaging entries that:
> +# - Are not flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID
> +# - Have a position in the index >= the number of entries present in the index
> +# after unstaging.
> +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging' '
> test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
> (
> cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
>
Gentle ping on this patch. It's just a small update to the comments for an fsmonitor related test based on feedback I received in the segfault fix patch series [1].
Thanks, William
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/3d3b290c-bc15-4bd5-e0c0-1377c9ec3ff9@gmail.com/