This patchseries has the ultimate goal of making git-am a builtin.
The version of git-am I'm sending out makes quite heavy use of system(), but I think that can be worked around. I just haven't figured out how, yet.
/Lukas
threads / patch / 4500
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Make a couple of commands builtin
This patchseries has the ultimate goal of making git-am a builtin.
The version of git-am I'm sending out makes quite heavy use of system(), but I think that can be worked around. I just haven't figured out how, yet.
/Lukas
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Make a couple of commands builtin
Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> wrote:
> This patchseries has the ultimate goal of making > git-am a builtin. > > The version of git-am I'm sending out makes quite heavy > use of system(), but I think that can be worked around. > I just haven't figured out how, yet.
I don't think git-stripspace needs to be a built-in. It doesn't even depend on git. It is just a tiny helper program used by git-am, git-applymbox, git-commit and git-tag. If all these commands are made built-in then git-stripspace becomes useless.
-- http://onion.dynserv.net/~timo/
Re: [PATCH 0/8] Make a couple of commands builtin
Timo Hirvonen wrote:
> Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> wrote: > >> This patchseries has the ultimate goal of making >> git-am a builtin. >> >> The version of git-am I'm sending out makes quite heavy >> use of system(), but I think that can be worked around. >> I just haven't figured out how, yet. > > I don't think git-stripspace needs to be a built-in. It doesn't even > depend on git. It is just a tiny helper program used by git-am, > git-applymbox, git-commit and git-tag. If all these commands are made > built-in then git-stripspace becomes useless. >
The reason I made it builtin was to de able to call it easily from git-am.
As you say, once all the users are builtin it could be removed, unless somone is using it in their scripts.
/Lukas